Compare
Chicken curry (home, curry cut) vs Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut)
Gram for calorie, Chicken curry (home, curry cut) carries more protein per kcal than Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) — 17.7 g protein for 194 kcal against 13.2 g for 167 kcal. For fat loss, where protein-per-calorie matters most, Chicken curry (home, curry cut) is the better lever. For muscle gain, where total protein grams matter more than the calorie cost, Chicken curry (home, curry cut) wins with 17.7 g against 13.2 g. On cost, Chicken curry (home, curry cut) is the cheaper way to hit a protein target — ₹33.9 per 20 g protein versus ₹68.2. Neither is "bad" — Chicken curry (home, curry cut) is a chicken item and Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) is a fish & seafood item, so the honest answer is usually "both, on different days," not a single winner.
Side by side
| Metric | Chicken curry (home, curry cut) | Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) |
|---|---|---|
| Serving | 1 katori (≈100 g curry cut with bone) | 1 katori |
| Calories | 194 | 167 |
| Protein g | 17.7 | 13.2 |
| Carbs g | 5.1 | 5.7 |
| Fat g | 11.4 | 10.1 |
| Cost per serving | ₹30 | ₹45 |
| Best for muscle gain | ✓ | |
| Best for fat loss | ✓ | |
| Best for budget | ✓ |
Questions people ask
- Which has more protein, Chicken curry (home, curry cut) or Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut)?
- Chicken curry (home, curry cut) has 17.7 g protein per serving; Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) has 13.2 g. Chicken curry (home, curry cut) is ahead in absolute grams.
- Which is better for fat loss?
- Chicken curry (home, curry cut) carries more protein per calorie, which tends to help with satiety on a calorie deficit — but total daily calories still decide the outcome.
- Which is cheaper per gram of protein?
- Chicken curry (home, curry cut) is the cheaper source of protein between the two, at current Indian retail prices.